Corruption and financial impropriety involving the purchase of Police uniforms by Hon. Munah Siah, Manneh Dunn et al. of the LNP.

Case Number
Case Title Corruption and financial impropriety involving the purchase of Police uniforms by Hon. Munah Siah, Manneh Dunn et al. of the LNP.
Submitted At July 15, 2010
Case Status Concluded: Not Guilty
Judge
Amount Involved $0.00 USD $0.00 LRD
Jurisdiction Supreme Court
Sector of the Case Security and Rule of Law
Level of Government National
Forms of Corruption
Summary of the Case In 2021, the LACC announced that a restitution of US$18,000 had been made to the government’s account of 1602003653 from the case Munah Sieh and others. According to the LACC, the restitution of the fund by former Police Director Sieh and the others stemmed from a court judgment which held them liable of US$199,800.The institution noted that each of the defendants was mandated to pay the amount of US$39,950 into government’s coffers, but only US$18,000 has been restituted so far.
Nature of the Case The Supreme Court of Liberia upheld the conviction of former Police Inspector General Beatrice Munah Sieh-Brown and four others for corruption and financial impropriety regarding purchase of uniform for the Emergency Response Unit (ERU) of the Liberia National Police (LNP). The former Police Chief and her Deputy, Harris Mannah Dunn conspired with a Nigerian Businessman, Prince Aknermi and three others and were found liable to the tone of US$199,800. On appeal, the Supreme Court noted that the weight of evidence adduced in court by government lawyers met the legal requirement to convict the former Police Inspector General Beatrice Munah Sieh-Brown and four for economic sabotage, theft of property, criminal facilitation and criminal conspiracy.

Disclaimer Notice: Every effort has been made to verify the accuracy of the information contained in this report. While information contained on this site may be in advanced stages of investigations and prosecution, or even concluded, some might be allegations pending investigation. Information on allegations and other cases not concluded should not be used to reach conclusions of guilt. CENTAL cannot accept responsibility for the consequences of use of information hereon for other purposes or in other contexts.

ACCEPT

Scroll to Top